158 research outputs found

    Reactive scheduling using a multi-agent model: the SCEP framework

    Get PDF
    Multi-agent systems have been successfully applied to the scheduling problem for some time. However, their use often leads to poorly unsatisfactory disappointing results. A new multi-agent model, called supervisor, customers, environment, producers (SCEP), is suggested in this paper. This model, developed for all types of planning activities, introduces a dialogue between two communities of agents leading to a high level of co-operation. Its two main interests are the following: first it provides a more efficient control of the consequences generated by the local decisions than usual systems to each agent, then the adopted architecture and behaviour permit an easy co-operation between the different SCEP models, which can represent different production functions such as manufacturing, supply management, maintenance or different workshops. As a consequence, the SCEP model can be adapted to a great variety of scheduling/planning problems. This model is applied to the basic scheduling problem of flexible manufacturing systems, andit permits a natural co-habitation between infinite capacity scheduling processes, performedby the manufacturing orders, and finite capacity scheduling processes, performed by the machines. It also provides a framework in order to react to the disturbances occurring at different levels of the workshop

    Component-based simulation for a reconfiguration study of transitic systems

    Get PDF
    This paper is organized as follows. Part A presents the context of reconfiguring transitic systems and the main idea in implementing the decision step. It comprises sections 1 to 3. Section 3 presents an example that illustrates the concepts presented in the next sections. Parts B and C express the models and principles used to simulate transitic systems, the result of which will be helpful for choosing the new configuration. Part B focuses mainly on models. It comprises sections 4 to 6. Part C focuses mainly on simulation principles. It comprises sections 7 to 10

    Hybridation of Bayesian networks and evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective optimization in an integrated product design and project management context

    Get PDF
    A better integration of preliminary product design and project management processes at early steps of system design is nowadays a key industrial issue. Therefore, the aim is to make firms evolve from classical sequential approach (first product design the project design and management) to new integrated approaches. In this paper, a model for integrated product/project optimization is first proposed which allows taking into account simultaneously decisions coming from the product and project managers. However, the resulting model has an important underlying complexity, and a multi-objective optimization technique is required to provide managers with appropriate scenarios in a reasonable amount of time. The proposed approach is based on an original evolutionary algorithm called evolutionary algorithm oriented by knowledge (EAOK). This algorithm is based on the interaction between an adapted evolutionary algorithm and a model of knowledge (MoK) used for giving relevant orientations during the search process. The evolutionary operators of the EA are modified in order to take into account these orientations. The MoK is based on the Bayesian Network formalism and is built both from expert knowledge and from individuals generated by the EA. A learning process permits to update probabilities of the BN from a set of selected individuals. At each cycle of the EA, probabilities contained into the MoK are used to give some bias to the new evolutionary operators. This method ensures both a faster and effective optimization, but it also provides the decision maker with a graphic and interactive model of knowledge linked to the studied project. An experimental platform has been developed to experiment the algorithm and a large campaign of tests permits to compare different strategies as well as the benefits of this novel approach in comparison with a classical EA

    Coupling system design and project planning: discussion on a bijective link between system and project structures

    Get PDF
    This article discuss the architecture of an integrated model able to support the coupling between a system design process and a project planning process. The project planning process is in charge of defining, planning and controlling the system design project. A benchmarking analysis carried out with fifteen companies belonging to the world competitiveness cluster, Aerospace Valley, has highlighted a lack of models, processes and tools for aiding the interactions between the two environments. We define the coupling as the establishment of links between entities of the two domains while preserving their original semantic, thus allowing information to be collected. The proposed coupling is recursive. It enables systems to be decomposed into subsystems when designers consider complexity to be too high, and can also decompose projects into sub-projects. The coupling enables systematically links to be drawn between project entities and system entities. In this paper, we discuss the different possibilities of linking system and project structures during the design and the planning processes. Firstly, after presenting the results of the industrial analysis, the different entities are defined and the various coupling modes are discussed

    Technic and Collaboration Breakdown Structures: Drivers of collaborative problem solving approaches in a supply chain context

    Get PDF
    Problem Solving Methodologies have been par excellence a cornerstone element of the firms’ strategy on achieving effective continuous improvement. But the enterprise evolution towards an extended environment characterized by network-based organization has radically changed the problem solving paradigms. This paper aims to propose a generic and collaborative methodology addressing more complex and distributed problems, dealing with Supply Chain issues and having a key role as a driver for building global competitive advantages and create superior performances at a Supply Chain level

    Proposition d’une architecture composĂ©e de multiples processus de retour d’expĂ©rience coopĂ©rants

    Get PDF
    Cet article prĂ©sente les premiers rĂ©sultats d’une Ă©tude rĂ©alisĂ©e en partenariat avec l’entreprise Turbomeca traitant des problĂšmes engendrĂ©s par l’implĂ©mentation de processus de retour d’expĂ©rience dans une entreprise Ă©tendue. La premiĂšre partie de l’article est dĂ©diĂ©e Ă  la dĂ©finition et Ă  la description des processus de retour d’expĂ©rience et des approches les plus avancĂ©es pour faciliter leur implĂ©mentation. Dans une seconde partie, nous montrons que dans une entreprise Ă©tendue, il est nĂ©cessaire de dĂ©finir de multiples processus de retour d’expĂ©rience pour que l’approche soit adaptĂ©e aux diffĂ©rents niveaux de dĂ©cisions et aux diffĂ©rents produits/technologies utilisĂ©s dans l’entreprise. Nous proposons une trame gĂ©nĂ©rale pour intĂ©grer ces diffĂ©rents aspects et nous prĂ©sentons une illustration d’un cas concret. Finalement, nous concluons sur l’originalitĂ© de notre proposition ses avantages et les perspectives de notre travail

    Scenario selection optimization in system engineering projects under uncertainty: a multi-objective ant colony method based on a learning mechanism

    Get PDF
    This paper presents a multi-objective Ant Colony Optimization (MOACO) algorithm based on a learning mechanism (named MOACO-L) for the optimization of project scenario selection under uncertainty in a system engineering (SE) process. The objectives to minimize are the total cost of the project, its total duration and the global risk. Risk is considered as an uncertainty about task costs and task durations in the project graph. The learning mechanism aims to improve the MOACO algorithm for the selection of optimal project scenarios in aSE project by considering the uncertainties on the project objectives. The MOACO-L algorithm is then developed by taking into account ants’ past experiences. The learning mechanism allows a better exploration of the search space and an improvement of the MOACO algorithm performance. To validate our approach, some experimental results are presented

    A risk-based approach applied to system engineering projects: a new learning based multi-criteria decision support tool based on an ant colony algorithm

    Get PDF
    This article proposes a multi-criteria decision support tool fully integrated within system engineering and project management processes that allows decision makers to select an optimal scenario of a project. A model based on an oriented graph includes all the alternative choices of a new system’s conception and realization. These choices take into account the risks inherent to perform project tasks in terms of cost and duration. The model of the graph is constructed by considering all the collaborative decisions of the different actors involved in the project. This decision support tool is based on an Ant Colony Algorithm (ACO) for its ability to provide optimal solutions in a reasonable amount of time. The model developed is a multi-objective new ant colony algorithm based on an innovative learning mechanism (named MONACO) that allows ants to learn from their previous choices in order to influence the future ones. The objectives to be minimized are the total cost of the project, its global duration and the risk associated with these criteria. The risk is modeled as an uncertainty related to the increase of the nominal values of cost and duration. The optimization tool is a part of an integrated and more global process, based on industrial standards (the System Engineering process and the Project Management one) that are widely known and used in companies

    Formalisation et exploitation de connaissances et d’expĂ©riences pour l’aide Ă  la dĂ©cision dans les processus d’ingĂ©nierie systĂšme

    Get PDF
    Ce manuscrit d’habilitation Ă  diriger des recherche synthĂ©tise mon activitĂ© professionnelle en enseignement et en recherche depuis l’obtention de mon poste de maĂźtre de confĂ©rences en 2001. AprĂšs l’obtention de mon diplĂŽme de doctorat, prĂ©parĂ© au Laboratoire GĂ©nie de Production (LGP) entre 1997 et 2000 sous la direction de Bernard Grabot, j’ai obtenu mon poste de maĂźtre de confĂ©rences Ă  l’UniversitĂ© de Bretagne Sud Ă  Lorient (UBS). Durant une pĂ©riode de trois annĂ©es dans cette universitĂ© et au Laboratoire d’Electronique des SystĂšmes Temps RĂ©els (LESTER devenu LAB-STICC par la suite), j’ai pu dĂ©velopper des activitĂ©s de recherche dans le domaine de la conception et de la reconfiguration des systĂšmes automatisĂ©s de type SystĂšmes Transitiques. Suite Ă  ma mutation Ă  l’Ecole Nationale d’IngĂ©nieurs de Tarbes en 2004, j’ai poursuivi mes activitĂ©s de recherche au Laboratoire GĂ©nie de Production (LGP) en lien avec le dĂ©veloppement d’outils d’aide ‘a la dĂ©cision dans les processus d’ingĂ©nierie systĂšme basĂ©s sur l’exploitation de connaissances et d’expĂ©riences. En enseignement, depuis 2001, mes activitĂ©s sont partagĂ©es entre le gĂ©nie industriel et l’informatique. Ce document est structurĂ© en deux parties : 1. la premiĂšre partie permet d’exposer, dans mon Curriculum Vitae dĂ©taillĂ©, un bilan de mes activitĂ©s d’enseignant-chercheur. Mon parcours professionnel, mes activitĂ©s d’enseignement et un bilan de mes activitĂ©s de recherche sont exposĂ©s de maniĂšre synthĂ©tique. Dans un premier temps, les enseignements dont j’ai eu la responsabilitĂ© (conception et ou rĂ©alisation) ainsi que les documents pĂ©dagogiques produits et les volumes horaires sont exposĂ©s. Ensuite, les encadrements de chercheurs (doctorants, masters et post-doctorat), les projets institutionnels (FUI et ANR) dans lesquels j’ai pris des responsabilitĂ©s, les partenariats avec des entreprises dans le cadre de contrats CIFRE, mes activitĂ©s d’animation de la recherche au niveau national et international font partie de ce bilan. Cette section se termine par la liste exhaustive de mes publications et communications (section 3.5) rĂ©alisĂ©es depuis le dĂ©but de mon activitĂ© de chercheur, en 1997, 2. la seconde partie synthĂ©tise mes activitĂ©s de recherche rĂ©alisĂ©es depuis 2001. Cette seconde partie est prĂ©sentĂ©e selon 6 chapitres. Le chapitre 1 permet d’exposer la problĂ©matique globale de mes travaux de recherche. Elle est orientĂ©e par un modĂšle Ă  trois niveaux (Processus, Outils, ExpĂ©riences / Connaissances) et Ă©tayĂ©e par un premier niveau d’étude bibliographique. Le niveau de dĂ©tail choisi permet de comprendre cette problĂ©matique dans sa globalitĂ©. Les processus ciblĂ©s, les outils dĂ©veloppĂ©s, les connaissances exploitĂ©es sont prĂ©sentĂ©s au regard de la littĂ©rature dans les diffĂ©rents domaines. Les chapitres 2 Ă  5 fournissent quant Ă  eux un niveau de dĂ©tail plus fin. Ils permettent de prĂ©senter les problĂ©matiques de maniĂšre affinĂ©e, les dĂ©veloppements rĂ©alisĂ©s et les contributions scientifiques majeures. L’objectif est de fournir des Ă©lĂ©ments qui soient utiles Ă  la comprĂ©hension de mon activitĂ© de recherche mais, Ă©galement, d’en favoriser l’exploitation ultĂ©rieure. Enfin, dans le chapitre 6, la conclusion permet de prendre le recul nĂ©cessaire au travaux rĂ©alisĂ©s et de proposer mon projet de recherche pour les annĂ©es Ă  venir
    • 

    corecore